Search for: "Mobile City LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 10:33 am by Public BLAWG
March 28, 2012, by Meyers Nave Appellant Besaro Mobile Home Park, LLC (“Besaro”) operated a mobile home park in the City of Fremont (“the City”). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
When the City of Richland incorporated in 1975, the mobile-home park became part of the City and was zoned “I–1, Light Industrial Zoning. [read post]
9 May 2022, 10:58 am by Daily Record Staff
Ellicott City-based Evon Medics LLC Monday was awarded a non-dilutive grant of $2.8 million for its Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Fast-Track study for the development and evaluation of its mobile health platform for remote management of substance use disorders (SUD). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 8:17 am by Jennifer R. Dixon
Supreme Court issued an opinion in T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:57 pm
B219352, (2nd Dist., Div. 4, August 31, 2010) Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:03 am by Raúl
Bloom Legal LLC, a New Orleans, Louisiana, law firm has just launched a mobile version of their website. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by Mary Ann Neary
 The Supreme Court's ruling on Jan. 14, 2015 in T-Mobile South LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 12:55 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by Jeffrey May
The October 7, 2011, decision of the federal district court in New York City in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:47 am by Oyez Project
The Court heard arguments last week in: T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 7:17 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:23 am by Andrew Hamm
The opinion in T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:35 pm
”  The Court held that the Food Trucks had standing to challenge the Rule’s constitutionality because the record established, among other things, that (i) they paid for and received mobile vendor licenses; (ii) they would have operated in various commercial districts in the City of Baltimore but for the Rule and would have received substantial benefit from operating in those districts; and (iii) they altered their business plans as a result of the Rule. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 11:10 am by Miriam Seifter
The longer Monday’s argument in T-Mobile South LLC v. [read post]